|Back to Three-Mode Data Sets |

Background to the Chopin Data

Data analysed in: Kroonenberg, P. M. (2008). Applied multiway data analysis. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.

Music appreciation and the evaluation of the characteristics of musical pieces have frequently been researched by means of semantic differential scales. In the present study, Chopin's Preludes were judged on semantic differential scales by 38 Japanese university students (21 males and 17 females). For students to be eligible for the study, they had to be already familiar with classical music so that they could be expected to provide appropriate judgments about the music. The concept mode consisted of the 24 short piano Preludes making up Op. 28 by Frédéric Chopin, played by Samson François on Angel, AA-8047. They were copied on a cassette tape and edited for the experiment. Eighteen pairs of adjectives were selected from previous research on semantic differential studies of music. It was expected that the students would judge rather objectively on all but two scales on the basis of key (mainly, major or minor) and tempo of each prelude. In contrast, it was expected that they would express subjective evaluations on the scales unattractive--attractive and uninteresting--interesting. Before the final analysis, the codings of some scales were reversed to induce as many positive correlations among the scales as possible. Details of the experimental procedure can be found in Murakami & Kroonenberg (2003)

References


Data description

The judges (subjects) were 38 Japanese university students (21 males and 17 females). The concepts were the 24 short piano solo pieces (or preludes) making up Op. 28 composed by Frédéric Chopin. They were copied on a cassette tape, and edited for the experiment. To avoid the experiment to be too long, of some longer preludes (No. 2, 4, 6, 8, 13, 15, 17, 21) only the first one minute and twenty seconds were presented.

Eighteen pairs of adjectives were selected from previous research on semantic differential studies of music. Also included were expressions often used to describe Chopin's music in the literature. These adjectives were arranged as bipolar scales with each member of the pair on the opposite end of the scale. These bipolar scales are always referred to in such a way that the low-end marker will be mentioned first and the high-end marker last. It was expected that the students would judge rather objectively on all but two scales on the basis of key (mainly, major or minor) and tempo of each prelude. In contrast, it was expected that they would express subjective evaluations on the scales, unattractive-attractive and uninteresting-interesting. The set of scales employed here is not necessarily a typical one used in semantic differential studies, where in general the scales can be divided into three categories, Evaluation, Activity, and Potency (Osgood, Suci, & Tannenbaum, 1957). Before the final analysis, the codings of some scales were reversed to induce as many positive correlations among them as possible.

The data set was arranged such that it formed a 24 x 20 x 38 block.

Rows (1st mode): Preludes

No. Key Tempo Circle of Fifths
1. C major Agitato
2. a minor Lento
3. G major Vivace
4. e minor Largo
5. D major Allegro molto
6. b minor Lento assai
7. A major Andantino
8. f# minor Molto agitato
9. E major Largo
10. c# minor Allegro molto
11. B major Vivace
12. g# minor Presto
13. F# major Lento
14. eb minor Allegro
15. Db major Sostenuto
16. bb minor Presto con fuoco
17. Ab major Allegretto
18. f minor Allegro molto
19. Eb major Vivace
20. c minor Largo
21. Bb major Cantabile
22. g minor Molto agitato
23. F major Moderato
24. d minor Allegro appasionato

Columns (2nd mode): Scales

1.bright - dark
2.slow - fast
3.uninteresting - interesting
4.gentle - severe
5.light - heavy
6.clear - cloudy
7.weak - strong
8.warm - cold
9.tranquil - vehement
10.small - large
11.soft - hard
12.still - loud
13.happy - sad
14.calm - restless
15.delicate - coarse
16.thin - thick
17.quiet - noisy
18.cheerful - gloomy
19.lyric - dramatic
20.unattractive - attractive

Slices (3rd mode): Judges

38 Japanese university students

Data arrangement

A three-way data array X = (x(i,j,k)) has the following form

                        |-----|i=1
                   |-----|    |i=2
              |-----|    |    |..
              |     |    |    |..
              |     |    |____|i=I=24    k=K=38
              |     |____|            k=2
              |_____|              k=1
            j=1,.,J=20
      

The actual data file has the following form:

          j=1,.,J=20
            |-----|i=1
            |     |i=2
            |     |..     k= 1
            |     |..
            |_____|i=I=24
            |-----|i=1
            |     |i=2
            |     |..     k= 2
            |     |..
            |_____|i=I=24
            |-----|i=1
            |     |i=2
            |     |..     k=38
            |     |..
            |_____|i=I=24
      

Thus the first mode (i) is nested in the third mode (k) and there are 24 (Preludes) times 38 (Judges) rows and 20 (Scales) columns.


Data handling

Preprocessing

These type of three-way rating data can be processed in two ways, either double-centred for each student or column-centred for each scale-student combination, i.e. across preludes. For details see Kroonenberg (2008). Applied multiway data analysis. Hoboken NJ: Wiley (Chapters 6 and 8).

Permissions

These data have kindly been made available for bonafide researchers by Prof. Takashi Murakami, Department of Sociology, Chukyo University, Toyota, Japan. Please be sure to quote the paper mentioned above and this website when using these data in a publication.

[Download the zipped Chopin Data]

[Applications Guide for analysing the Chopin data with Tuckals3. (1.3MB PDF - Preliminary version)]


| Centre for Child and Family Studies | Institute of Leiden Institute of Education and Child Studies | The Three-Mode Company | Three-Mode Data Sets | TOP |
P.M. Kroonenberg
Institute of Leiden Institute of Education and Child Studies, Leiden University
Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands
Tel. *-31-71-5273446/5273434 (secr.); fax *-31-71-5273945
E-mail: kroonenb at fsw.leidenuniv.nl

Created: 8-7-2009
Last Updated: 9-7-2009